overview
context
problem
research
ideation
solution
impact

[TIMELINE]

January to June 2026

[ROLE]

Product Designer

[TEAM]

4 designers, 7 developers, 2 PMs

[TOOLS]

Figma, Notion

[CONTEXT]

Transforming content discovery to drive user engagement and expand SlowFactory's reach

Slow Factory’s editorial platform, Everything Is Political, explores the intersections of climate, culture, and politics.


The platform currently functions as a static content archive with limited opportunities for community engagement. When users come to engage with thoughtfully produced material, they struggle to get to and find the right content.

[PROBLEM]

Users struggle to find relevant content

The platform lacks a sorting & filtering system

This makes it hard to navigate the archive by topic or interest.

+

Constant scrolling is required to surface content

There's no intelligent discovery layer that adapts to user intent.

=

Biggest friction point — Lack of explore page


The explore page, or lack of one, was identified as the central problem. Without a way to browse or filter, readers can't stay and engage.

"User continuously scrolls unsure of what article to engage with"

[RESEARCH]

Understanding what brings readers back

What makes online publishing platforms succeed on their explore and discovery pages?

We hypothesized that…


Returning users need ways to quickly discover content aligned with their

interests and reasons to keep exploring, more than just a chronological feed

Understand filtering patterns used by top platforms

Identify what drives content engagement and retention

Analyzing different competitors to see how they tackled these same features while referencing the core values of the company

What we learned & applied

Turning research insights into design decisions

  1. Give users control over discovery


Top platforms use tag-based filtering so users self-direct discovery without friction



DESIGN DECISION


-> Introduce topic-based filtering so users can quickly narrow content to what interests them

  1. Engagement creates a reason to return


Likes, saves, and comments create feedback loops that encourage users to interact



DESIGN DECISION


-> Prioritize lightweight engagement actions that make exploration feel participatory and not just passive reading

3. More content ≠ more discovery


Visual hierarchy in grid layouts reduces cognitive load vs. linear scroll



DESIGN DECISION


-> Use a structured, editorial-style layout to make content easier to browse and surface more stories at once

[DESIGN DIRECTION]

How might we...

Design an explore experience that helps readers quickly find content relevant to them while keeping them engaged enough to build a community around it?

[IDEATION]

Our design process wasn’t linear

A detailed breakdown of every design decision, what drove each change, and what the usability testing session revealed.

Full Walkthrough

Summary View

V1 — INITIAL CONCEPT

A fully curated explore page

DESIGN RATIONALE

Competitive analysis with Medium, Patreon, and Substack showed that the most engaging explore pages combined curated editorial picks with social discovery (following channels and authors). V1 translated this directly into three sections stacked vertically.

STRUCTURE

Articles to read

Editorially curated content surfaced for the user, no filtering required

Channels to follow

Topic-based channels modeled on newsletter or feed subscriptions

Authors to follow

Creator discovery to encourage repeat engagement and community building

ASSUMPTION GOING IN

If users can follow channels and authors, they'll self-build a personalized feed over time, reducing the need for a filtering system.

Articles to Read

Channels to Follow

Authors to Follow

Articles to Read

Home Explore Page

Channels to Follow

Authors to Follow

V2 — POST USABILITY TESTING

Refined by what users actually needed

DESIGN RATIONALE

To validate our key design decisions, we tested the discovery and profile flows with 4 SlowFactory admins. Usability testing revealed that curation alone wasn't enough. Users wanted more control and editorial clarity.

TASKS GIVEN

Walk me through how you’d find an article you’d want to read

Walk me through how you’d return to an article you were reading earlier

Walk me through how you’d read an article within a specific topic

Moderated 1:1 Session with Maya

“Oh I really like this. I can just pick what topics are most important to me and what I actually want to see."

Maya explains that she liked curating her explore page by picking topics that resonated with her the most

WHAT WE FOUND

WHAT WE CHANGED

Channels weren’t intuitive

The concept didn't map to how the user thought about browsing on this platform

Removed

Channels dropped

Replaced with topic selection, a model users already understood.

“For you” felt vague

Users weren't sure if it was personalized or editorially chosen

Renamed

"For you" → "Editor's pick"

Makes the editorial voice explicit. Pinned to top.

Recently viewed sought instinctively

User tried to return to earlier content and expected it on the explore page

Added

Recently viewed section

Directly validated. Users expected it here.

Topic selection resonated

Choosing what to see felt more empowering than a curated list

Added

Topic selection + top articles

Gives users agency. Top articles adds social proof without needing likes.

Channels to Follow

Editor’s Pick

Topic Selection

Top Articles

Recently Viewed

Authors to Follow

Likes + Saves

V2 Explore page

V3 — FINAL DESIGN (SHIPPED)

Scoped to what matters most

DESIGN RATIONALE

Development constraints required a significant scope reduction from V2. Rather than pushing for the full feature set, the decision was made to protect the two most validated and technically feasible features and ship a leaner but functional explore experience.

WHAT SHIPPED

Taxonomy filtering

Directly solves the core problem using existing content tags. No new backend dependency needed.

Recently viewed

Validated across all three rounds. Users instinctively looked for it in testing. Implementable with local storage.

THE TRADEOFF: This version solves discovery but doesn't yet build community. The features that were cut would turn Slowfactory from a content archive into an ecosystem. That remains the long-term goal, and scoping back here was a constraint, not a change in direction.

DEFERRED — NOT DELETED

Editor’s Pick

Requires ongoing editorial maintenance — too costly to sustain at this stage

Top Articles

Needs backend ranking logic that doesn't exist on the platform yet

Likes + Saves

Requires social infrastructure the platform hasn't built yet for it to live on the homepage

Authors to Follow

Deferred to a later community-focused phase of the roadmap

Editor’s Pick

Topic Selection

Top Articles

Authors to Follow

Recently Viewed

Likes + Saved

Taxonomy Filtering

Sort Function

V3 Explore page

[SOLUTION]

Find what you came for, and keep coming back

A taxonomy-based filtering system and persistent recently viewed section transform Slowfactory's archive into a browsable, returnable experience so users spend less time searching and more time engaged with content that matters to them.

Discover content in Everything is Political’s streamlined explore page

[IMPACT]

What I took away…

  • Design isn't linear. I revisited earlier stages repeatedly and had to stop chasing "perfection"


  • Intentionality over polish. Every feature needed a clear reason grounded in a user need, not just a requirement to check off.


  • Designing alongside developers meant understanding technical feasibility in real time meant

Next steps…

  • Our mobile app is in the works to be deployed on both Google Play and the App Store


  • Deferred features (Editor's Pick, Top Articles, Likes + Saves, Authors to Follow) remain the long-term roadmap toward community, not just discovery